FT PENERAPAN PRINSIP FILSAFAT PROGRESIVISME DALAM PEMBELAJARAN KOLABORATIF PAI DI SMP: ANALISIS KESENJANGAN FILOSOFIS DAN KEPEMIMPINAN INSTRUKSIONAL
Abstract
Twenty-first-century education demands a paradigm shift from conventional, teacher-centered learning to student-centered learning. This demand aligns with the Kurikulum Merdeka, which emphasizes critical, creative, and collaborative competencies. The philosophy of progressivism (John Dewey) offers a theoretical foundation through the principles of learning by doing and cooperative learning. This study aims to gain an in-depth understanding of the implementation of progressivist principles in collaborative learning in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) at SMP Negeri 6 Darangdan. Employing a qualitative approach with a case study method, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation analysis. The findings indicate that the implementation of progressivism remains administrative rather than philosophical in nature. There is a significant gap between planning documents (lesson plans/teaching modules) that include progressive labels such as Problem-Based Learning and actual classroom practices, in which teachers’ roles as facilitators have not been optimally realized. Furthermore, although school managerial support is strong at the policy level, weaknesses were identified in the area of instructional leadership, as supervision focuses primarily on administrative completeness rather than on pedagogical coaching for teachers. This study concludes that progressive PAI learning requires strong integration between teachers’ pedagogical commitment and capacity-based managerial support.
Downloads
References
Cogan, M. L. (1973). Clinical Supervision. Houghton Mifflin.
Danny Meirawan. (2010). Kepemimpinan & Manajemen Pendidikan Masa Depan. IPB Press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. The Macmillan Company.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.
Fitriani. (2019). Pengaruh pembelajaran kolaboratif terhadap keterampilan sosial dan motivasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 7(2), 112-125.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Guthrie, J. H. (2004). School and School Productivity. Richard D. Irwin.
H. Rahmat. (2013). Filsafat Administrasi. Pustaka Setia.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of the principal. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247.
Hoy, Wayne K. & Miskel, Cecil G. (2001). Education Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice (6th ed.). Mc Graw-Hill Co.
Imam Barnadib. (1976). Filsafat Pendidikan. Andi Offset.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Junihot Simanjuntak. (2013). Filsafat Pendidikan dan Pendidikan Kristen. Andi Offset.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.
Muhaimin. (2012). Paradigma Pendidikan Islam: Upaya mengefektifkan Pendidikan Agama Islam di sekolah. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suhardan, Dadang. (2010). Supervisi Profesional: Layanan dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran di Era Otonomi Daerah. Alvabeta.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ricky Yoseptry, Rina Supriati, Iis Kurniawati, Heri Hasanudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal allows anyone to compose, correct, and do derivative works, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit for the original work. This license is the freest. It is recommended for maximum distribution and use of licensed material.
The submitted paper is assumed not to contain any proprietary materials that are not protected by patent rights or patent applications; The responsibility for technical content and protection of proprietary materials rests with the authors and their organizations and not the responsibility of journal or its editorial staff. The primary (first/appropriate) author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been viewed and approved by all other authors. The author's responsibility is to obtain all necessary copyright waivers to use any copyrighted material in the manuscript before submission.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share a copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt a remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
