FT FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN SEBAGAI DASAR PEMBELAJARAN BERMAKNA DALAM KURIKULUM TEMATIK SD
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the application of educational philosophy as the foundation of meaningful learning within the Thematic Curriculum in elementary schools. Educational philosophy—particularly progressivism, constructivism, and humanism—serves as an essential basis for designing holistic, contextual, and student-centered learning. However, the implementation of thematic learning in schools often reveals a gap between the philosophical foundations of the curriculum and classroom learning practices. This research employs a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through classroom observations, in-depth interviews with teachers, and document analysis of lesson plans (RPP) and learning implementation. The findings indicate that teachers’ understanding of the philosophical foundations of the curriculum varies and tends to be technical in nature. Nevertheless, several philosophical values—such as learning by doing, contextual learning, and respect for students’ individuality—have emerged in practice, although not yet implemented consistently. The contribution of educational philosophy is reflected in the increased relevance of learning materials to real-life contexts, the development of learner autonomy, and the creation of more meaningful learning processes. This study emphasizes the importance of strengthening teachers’ philosophical understanding as a key factor in the successful implementation of the Thematic Curriculum and as an effort to build learning that liberates students intellectually, socially, and emotionally.
Downloads
References
Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View. Kluwer Academic.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. Pearson.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and Education. Free Press.
Djamarah, S. B., & Zain, A. (2010). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Rineka Cipta.
Emzir. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Fogarty, R. (1991). The Mindful School: How to Integrate the Curricula. IRI/Skylight Publishing.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.
Hamalik, O. (2014). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara.
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Ghalia Indonesia.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of Teaching. Pearson.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Kurikulum 2013: Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah Dasar/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Kemendikbud RI.
Kemendikbud. (2016). Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Ki Hajar Dewantara. (1962). Pendidikan. Majelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa.
Ki Hajar Dewantara. (2011). Pemikiran, Konsepsi, Keteladanan Ki Hadjar Dewantara. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muzakkir, M. (2021). “Pembelajaran Tematik dalam Kajian Filosofis.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 6(3), 145–158.
Nasution, S. (2014). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Bumi Aksara.
Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Educational Psychology: Developing Learners. Pearson.
Piaget, J. (1972). The Psychology of the Child. Basic Books.
Rusman. (2017). Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu: Teori dan Praktik di Sekolah Dasar. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sanjaya, W. (2015). Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Kencana.
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Pearson.
Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sutanto, A. (2020). “Pembelajaran Bermakna dalam Perspektif Konstruktivisme.” JP3: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 11(2), 215–230.
Trianto. (2014). Desain Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Kencana.
Uno, H. B. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Bumi Aksara.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Zais, R. S. (1976). Curriculum: Principles and Foundations. Harper & Row.
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Widyasti Utami, Widia Utami, Wiwi Widyaningsih, Ricky Yoseptry, Hendri Abdul Qohar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal allows anyone to compose, correct, and do derivative works, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit for the original work. This license is the freest. It is recommended for maximum distribution and use of licensed material.
The submitted paper is assumed not to contain any proprietary materials that are not protected by patent rights or patent applications; The responsibility for technical content and protection of proprietary materials rests with the authors and their organizations and not the responsibility of journal or its editorial staff. The primary (first/appropriate) author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been viewed and approved by all other authors. The author's responsibility is to obtain all necessary copyright waivers to use any copyrighted material in the manuscript before submission.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share a copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt a remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.








