PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW TERHADAP PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR EKONOMI PADA SISWA KELAS X - 1 SMA NEGERI 1 PRAJEKAN MATERI POKOK KEBUTUHAN
Abstract
Base early observation and yielding interview by learns economy at SMAN 1 Prajekan, gotten by that information at class X-1 result studies student still haven't accomplished Minimal Thoroughness Criterion. Besides is gotten that method that utilized by tend teacher utilizes discourse, so student perceives saturated to study and there are many material which was complete. This research intent to increase and completes economic studying result student braze X-1 through learning model implements Jigsaw type on subject “KEBUTUHAN” discussion. This observational type is Observational Action braze. Observational activity in one cycle is done through 4 phases which is planning, action performing, observation, reflection. If was successful, done by succeeding cycle. Data collecting via interview, essay, observation, and documentation. Result observationaling to point out that on kognitif's domain on alae I. cycle classical is 78,57% but yielding those are still haven't accomplished ala thoroughness percentage klasikal where klasikal's thoroughness already been established is 85% therefore researcher drawn out to go to cycles II. and yielding learned one is reached is 96,43%. On afektif's domain I. cycle as big as 75% and cycles II. as big as 97,5%. For psikomotor's domain I. cycle as big as 80% and cycles II. as 100%. With so gets to be concluded that learnings model implements Jigsaw types can increase and complete economic student studying results student braze X-1 SMAN 1 Prajekan on subject “KEBUTUHAN” discussion. Base observational result already we do it, therefore our tips is implemented model Jigsaw type learning can make alternative in teaching by espoused supportive learning media, e.g. charta so student not saturated and passive at within class. By use of type learning model this Jigsaw student becomes to be motivated, active, and innovative and creative because agreeable class condition. It visually on yielding step-up studies student on cycle II. which is 96,43% as compared to studying result on I. cycle which is 78,57%, so also on afektif's aspect and psikomotor is student.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W. Et all. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing. New York : Longman
Arikunto, Suharsimi., Suharjono. & Supardi. 2011. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara .
Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Cipta.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Isjoni. 2007. Cooperatif Learning. Bandung: ALFABETA
Iskandar. 2008. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jambi: GP Press
Jauhar, M. 2011. Implementasi Paikem. Jakarta : Prestasi Pustakaif
Silbrman, M. 2009. Active Learning 101 Pembelajaran Aktif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Insan Madani
Slameto. 2010. Belajar & Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Sudjana, N. 1989. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : Pt. Remaja Rosdakarya
Sudjana, N. 1990. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : Pt. Remaja Rosdakarya
Sudjana, N. 2011. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Pt. Remaja Rosdakarya
Suprijono, A. 2009. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Suprijono, A. 2010. Cooperative Learning: Teori dan Aplikasi Paikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar
Aqib Zainal DKK, 2011. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Untuk Guru, SD, SLB, TK, Bandung : CV. Yramada Widya.
Komaidi Didik dan Wijayati Wahyu, 2011. Panduan Lengkap PTK, Yogyakarta : Sabda Media.
STKIP PGRI Sirubondo, 2012. Pedoman Skripsi dan Standar Operasional (SOP) Pemrograman Skripsi Mahasiswa sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Situbondo : STKIP PGRI Situbondo.
Jurnal allows anyone to compose, correct, and do derivative works, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit for the original work. This license is the freest. It is recommended for maximum distribution and use of licensed material.
The submitted paper is assumed not to contain any proprietary materials that are not protected by patent rights or patent applications; The responsibility for technical content and protection of proprietary materials rests with the authors and their organizations and not the responsibility of journal or its editorial staff. The primary (first/appropriate) author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been viewed and approved by all other authors. The author's responsibility is to obtain all necessary copyright waivers to use any copyrighted material in the manuscript before submission.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share a copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt a remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.