STRATEGI PENDIDIKAN TINGGI DALAM MEMBANGUN SMART STUDENT MELALUI LITERASI KRITIS DAN CIVIC SKILL DI UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NUSANTARA
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis strategi pendidikan tinggi dalam membangun smart student melalui penguatan literasi kritis dan Civic skill di Universitas Islam Nusantara. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada kebutuhan perguruan tinggi dalam menghasilkan lulusan yang tidak hanya unggul secara akademik, tetapi juga memiliki kemampuan berpikir kritis, literasi informasi yang baik, serta keterampilan kewarganegaraan yang adaptif terhadap dinamika masyarakat digital. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi, sedangkan analisis data menggunakan model Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña yang meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi pendidikan tinggi di Universitas Islam Nusantara telah dilaksanakan melalui penguatan kurikulum berbasis Outcome-Based Education (OBE), penerapan pembelajaran berpusat pada mahasiswa, serta integrasi teknologi digital dalam proses pembelajaran. Literasi kritis mahasiswa berkembang melalui aktivitas akademik seperti diskusi, analisis studi kasus, dan penulisan ilmiah, meskipun kemampuan evaluasi informasi digital masih perlu ditingkatkan. Sementara itu, Civic skill mahasiswa berkembang melalui keterlibatan dalam organisasi kemahasiswaan, kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat, dan forum diskusi ilmiah. Integrasi antara literasi kritis dan Civic skill masih dalam tahap penguatan, namun menunjukkan potensi signifikan dalam membentuk karakter smart student.
Kesimpulan penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa strategi pendidikan tinggi memiliki peran penting dalam membentuk smart student yang tidak hanya cerdas secara intelektual, tetapi juga memiliki kesadaran sosial dan tanggung jawab kewarganegaraan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan integrasi kurikulum, metode pembelajaran, dan budaya akademik untuk mendukung pengembangan kompetensi mahasiswa secara holistik
Downloads
References
Banks, J. A. (2008). An Introduction to Multicultural Education. Boston: Pearson.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Branson, M. S. (1998). The Role of Civic Education. Calabasas: Center for Civic Education.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. California: Insight Assessment.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.
Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-Based Education: The Future Is Today. Medical Teacher Press.
Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and Power. New York: Routledge.
Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). Further Notes on the Four Resources Model. Brisbane: Queensland University.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. California: Sage.
Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Patrick, J. J. (2000). Education for Civic Engagement. Bloomington: Indiana University.
Quigley, C. N. (2014). Civic Education for Democracy. Calabasas: Center for Civic Education.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Boston: Pearson.
Ten Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2004). Critical Thinking as a Citizenship Competence. Amsterdam: University Press.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
UNESCO. (2021). Digital Literacy in Education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Winarno. (2013). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suryadi, A. (2016). Strategi Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suparno, P. (2015). Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ricky Yoseptry, Lilis Irmawatie, Wachyudin Wachyudin, Arif Firmansyah, Miftahul Malik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal allows anyone to compose, correct, and do derivative works, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit for the original work. This license is the freest. It is recommended for maximum distribution and use of licensed material.
The submitted paper is assumed not to contain any proprietary materials that are not protected by patent rights or patent applications; The responsibility for technical content and protection of proprietary materials rests with the authors and their organizations and not the responsibility of journal or its editorial staff. The primary (first/appropriate) author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been viewed and approved by all other authors. The author's responsibility is to obtain all necessary copyright waivers to use any copyrighted material in the manuscript before submission.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share a copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt a remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
