Kajian Literatur: Implementasi Performance-Based Budgeting Pada Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia
Abstract
This paper discusses the application of performance-based budgeting in higher education institutions in Indonesia. This study uses a literature review method with narrative analysis to deepen knowledge about performance-based budgeting. The conclusion that can be drawn from this study is that the implementation of performance-based budgeting plays an important role in realizing a quality higher education institution. To implement performance-based budgeting, universities must consider management competencies, organizational commitment, reward systems, and higher education quality. This paper provides a different perspective to understand the application of performance-based budgeting by integrating institutional management theory and organizational theory in setting organizational goals.
Downloads
References
Ahyaruddin, M., & Akbar, R. (2018). Indonesian Local Government’s Accountability and Performance: the Isomorphism Institutional Perspective. In Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi (Vol. 19, Issue 1). Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.190187
Anwar Abidin, A. (2017). Manajemen Pembiayaan Pendidikan Tinggi dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Mutu (Studi Kasus Pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Menengah di Surabaya). Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 3(1), 87.
Bansal, H. S., Irving, P. G., & Taylor, S. F. (2004). A three-component model of customer to service providers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 234–250.
Barr, N., & Crawford, I. (2004). Financing higher education: Answers from the UK. In Financing Higher Education: Answers from the UK. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203321515
Cahyono, D., Mulyono, A., & Lesmana, S. (2001). Pengaruh Politik dan Gaya Kepemimpinan terhadap Keefektifan Anggaran Partisipatif dalam Peningkatan Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Empiris di Perguruan Tinggi, Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 3(3), 543–564.
Chu, A., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2018). Between quality and control: what can we learn from higher education quality assurance policy in the Netherlands. Quality in Higher Education, 24(3), 260–270.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2018.1559513
Dicker, R., Garcia, M., Kelly, A., & Mulrooney, H. (2019). What does ‘quality’ in higher education mean? Perceptions of staff, students and employers. Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1425–1441.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1445987
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2000). The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Advances in Strategic Management, 17, 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17011-1
Hager, G., Hobson, A., & Wilson, G. (2001). Performance-based budgeting: Concepts and examples (Issue 302). Legislative Research Commission, Committee for Pram Review and Investigations.
Hakim, A., & Mochmamad, M. (2019). Proses Perencanaan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Pada Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang. Profit, 13(01), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.profit.2019.013.01.6
Hashim, J., & Wok, S. (2014). Competence, performance and trainability of older workers of higher educational institutions in Malaysia. Employee Relations, 36(1), 82–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2012-0031
Jones, R. (2014). Public Sector Accounting. In Public Sector Accounting. Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446263105
Jones, R., Lande, E., Lüder, K., & Portal, M. (2013). A Comparison of Budgeting and Accounting Reforms in the National Governments of France, Germany, the UK and the US. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(4), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12022
Julnes, P. de L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693–708.
Kemenristekdikti. (2019). Statistik Pendidikan Tinggi (Higher Education Statistics) 2019. In Pusdatin Kemenristekdikti.
http://www.mohe.gov.my/web_statistik/
Kretek, P. M., Dragšić, Ž., & Kehm, B. M. (2013). Transformation of university governance: On the role of university board members. Higher Education, 65(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9580-x
Kristiantoro, H., Basuki, B., & Fanani, Z. (2018). The Institutionalization of Spending Review in Budgeting System in Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi, 19(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.190190
Locke, E. A. (1975). Personnel attitudes and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 26(1), 457–480.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.26.020175.002325
Locke, Edwin A., & Latham, G. P. (2013). New developments in goal setting and task performance. In New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082744
Lorensius, & Ping, T. (2021). Model Pembiayaan Pendidikan di Perguruan Tinggi pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Indonesian Journal Of Education and Humanity, 1(2), 107–119.
Lorensius, Ping, T., & Poernomo, S. A. (2021). Tugas dan Fungsi Manajemen Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Gaudium Vestrum: Jurnal Kateketik Pastoral, 5(1), 1–12. https://ojs.stkpkbi.ac.id/index.php/jgv/article/view/97
Lorensius, Warman, W., Silpanus, S., & Ping, T. (2021). Leadership model and planning strategies in private Catholic colleges during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Studies in Social Sciences (IJESSS), 1(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53402/ijesss.v1i2.16
Lorenz, C., & Wigger, B. U. (2012). The impact of performance budgeting on public spending in Germany’s Laender. In The Impact of Performance Budgeting on Public Spending in Germany’s Laender (pp. 1–143). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3483-3
Lu, Y., Willoughby, K., & Arnett, S. (2011). Performance Budgeting in the American States: What’s Law got to do with it? State and Local Government Review, 43(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X11407523
Martí, C. (2013). Performance budgeting and accrual budgeting: A Study of the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. Public Performance and Management Review, 37(1), 33–58.
Naranjo-Gil, D., & Hartmann, F. (2007). How CEOs use management information systems for strategy implementation in hospitals. Health Policy, 81(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.05.009
Noman, Z. (2008). Performance budgeting in the United Kingdom. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v8-art4-en
Osborne, D. (1993). Reinventing government. Public Productivity & Management Review, 349–356.
PDDikti. (2021). PDDikti: Pangkalan Data Pendidikan Tinggi Bermutu. https://pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id/
Pratolo, S., Mukti, A. H., & Sofyani, H. (2021). Intervening Role of Performance-Based Budgeting in the Relationship between Transformational Leadership , Organizational Commitment and University Performance. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 8(1), 77–90.
Regmi, K. D. (2016). Education 2030: Financing for Adult Education in Least Developed Countries. 2016 Annual Conference of CASAE/ACEEA, 260–265. http://www.academia.edu/download/45999194/Regmi-2016.pdf
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior (Vol. 4). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Santosa, A. B. (2015). Sistem Penganggaran Pendidikan Tinggi Dari Old Public Management Menuju New Public Management. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v2i2.556
Sayidah, N., Ady, S. U., Supriyati, J., Sutarmin, Winedar, M., Mulyaningtyas, A., & Assagaf, A. (2019). Quality and university governance in Indonesia. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(4), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n4p10
Schiller, D., & Liefner, I. (2007). Higher education funding reform and university–industry links in developing countries: The case of Thailand. Higher Education, 54(4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9011-y
Simons, R. (2000). Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy. In Accounting Education (Vol. 15, Issue 1). Prentice
Sofyani, H. (2018). Does Performance-Based Budgeting Have a Correlation with Performance Measurement System? Evidence from Local Government in Indonesia. Foundations of Management, 10(1), 163–176.
https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2018-0013
Stewart, R., Van Rooyen, C., Dickson, K., Majoro, M., & De Wet, T. (2010). What is the impact of microfinance on poor people ? In A systematic review of evidence from … (pp. 1–104). EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education
Suryanto, S., & Kurniati, P. S. (2020). Tinjauan Perubahan Sistem Penganggaran Berbasis Kinerja Di Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Dan Pembangunan, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.20527/jpp.v1i2.2441
Trakman, L. (2008). Modelling university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1–2), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00384.x
Tsinidou, M., Gerogiannis, V., & Fitsilis, P. (2010). Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: An empirical study. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881011058669
United Nations. (2017). World economic situation and prospects 2017. Acessado Em, 20.
Wardhani, R. S., Taufiq, Fuadah, L. L., Siddik, S., & Awaluddin, M. (2019). Good University Governance : Budgeting Participation. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 14(1), 1–18.
https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v14i1.808
Warman. (2021). Establishing the governmental policy to promote engagement within the inclusive education system in Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(1), 124–148.
Copyright (c) 2021 Lorensius Lorensius, Warman Warman, Yunata Tresia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal allows anyone to compose, correct, and do derivative works, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit for the original work. This license is the freest. It is recommended for maximum distribution and use of licensed material.
The submitted paper is assumed not to contain any proprietary materials that are not protected by patent rights or patent applications; The responsibility for technical content and protection of proprietary materials rests with the authors and their organizations and not the responsibility of journal or its editorial staff. The primary (first/appropriate) author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been viewed and approved by all other authors. The author's responsibility is to obtain all necessary copyright waivers to use any copyrighted material in the manuscript before submission.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share a copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt a remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
