THE BLENDED LEARNING METHOD IN IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILLS OF MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS
Abstract
Implementing online learning causes a lack of enthusiasm and low motivation to learn English speaking skills. This study aims to analyze English speaking skills by implementing Hybrid learning-based in junior high school. This research used classroom action research (CAR) that determines the set of two cycles according to the characteristics of the material. Research in each Cycle was carried out through four stages. Application of the Learning Model Hybrid learning applies two activities which include bold and limited face-to-face learning. The number of students in the class was divided into odd and even absences. Data collection methods used observation, evaluation, and student responses. Methods of data analysis employed descriptive analysis. Preliminary learning outcomes before implementing hybrid learning mastery were only 54,84%. Cycle I showed an increase in learning completeness, reaching 84.2%. Cycle II also showed an increase in learning completeness with 94.7%. Data from Cycle I and Cycle II results reveal that implementing Hybrid learning can improve learning outcomes and the proportion of minimum mastery standards that is very significant. The implications of this research are expected to improve English speaking skills in class X students.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. Y., Hussin, S., & Ismail, K. (2019). Implementation of flipped classroom model and its effectiveness on English speaking performance. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V14I09.10348
Al-Ajmi, N. H., & Aljazzaf, Z. M. (2020). Factors influencing the use of multimedia technologies in teaching english language in Kuwait. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I05.12277
Amin, A. K., Degeng, N. S., Setyosari, P., & Djatmika, E. T. (2021). The Effectiveness of Mobile Blended Problem Based Learning on Mathematical Problem Solving. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V15I01.17437
Arslan, A. (2020). A systematic review on flipped learning in teaching english as a foreign or second language. In Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies (Vol. 16, Nomor 2). https://doi.org/10.17263/JLLS.759300
Baena, F., Guarin, A., Mora, J., Sauza, J., & Retat, S. (2017). Learning Factory: The Path to Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.022
Baihaqi, M. B. (2017). Pendidikan dan Digitalisasi di Era Milenial. Sabtu, 23/12/17.
Butnaru, G. I., Niță, V., Anichiti, A., & Brînză, G. (2021). The effectiveness of online education during covid 19 pandemic—a comparative analysis between the perceptions of academic students and high school students from romania. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095311
El Nekhely, M. A. E. (2021). The Effect of Hands-On Minds-On Learning on Reducing Kindergarteners’ Foreign Language Learning Anxiety. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.21608/jrciet.2021.163344
Hafifah, G. N., & Sulistyo, G. H. (2020). Teachers’ ICT literacy and ICT integration in ELT in the Indonesian higher education setting. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.762050
Hamzah, F., Phong, S. Y., Sharifudin, M. A. S., Zain, Z. M., & Rahim, M. (2020). Exploring Students’ Readiness on English Language Blended Learning. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i4.11948
Hastini, L. Y., Fahmi, R., & Lukito, H. (2020). Apakah Pembelajaran Menggunakan Teknologi dapat Meningkatkan Literasi Manusia pada Generasi Z di Indonesia? Jurnal Manajemen Informatika (JAMIKA), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.34010/jamika.v10i1.2678
Karatas, K., & Arpaci, I. (2021). The role of self-directed learning, metacognition, and 21st century skills predicting the readiness for online learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10786
Kurtzo, F., Edgar, L. D., Edgar, D. W., Graham, D. L., & Russell, M. (2019). Exploring Communication Tendencies of Program Facilitators. Journal of Applied Communications, 103(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1415
Lee, J. S. (2020). English Language Programs for Seniors: Motivational Constructs and Teaching Objectives. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52225-4_16
Marzulina, L., Harto, K., Erlina, D., Holandyah, M., Desvitasari, D., Arnilawati, A., Fridiyanto, F., & Mukminin, A. (2021). Challenges in teaching english for efl learners at pesantren: Teachers’ voices. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1112.10
Maulina, M., Sri Andriyani, A., Amin, S., Nasrullah, R., Asdar, A., & Hamsiah, A. (2022). Students’ Perception in Learning English through Blended Learning. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v3i1.138
Menggo, S., Suastra, I. M., Budiarsa, M., & Padmadewi, N. N. (2019). Needs analysis of academic-English speaking material in promoting 21 st century skills. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12247a
Muamaroh, Hidayat, N., & Lestari, S. (2020). Tertiary students’ anxiety in speaking English. In English Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching in a Changing Era. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429021039-26
Nurhalim, M. (2018). Analisis Perkembangan Kurikulum di Indonesia (Sebuah Tinjauan Desain Dan Pendekatan). INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v16i3.1597
Perez-Poch, A., Alcober, J., Alier, M., d’Arc Prat, J., Llorens, A., & López, D. (2021). ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION OF A STEAM LECTURER-TRAINING PROGRAM BASED ON COMPETENCIES IN AN HYBRID CONTEXT. Proceedings - SEFI 49th Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?
Pham, L., Williamson, S., & Berry, R. (2020). Student Perceptions of E-Learning Service Quality, E-Satisfaction, and E-Loyalty. In Research Anthology on Preparing School Administrators to Lead Quality Education Programs. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3438-0.ch037
Purwadhi, P. (2019). Pengembangan Kurikulum dalam Pembelajaran Abad XXI. MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v4i2.22201
Římalová, L. S. (2020). Folk linguistics. Casopis pro Moderni Filologii, 102(1). https://doi.org/10.14712/23366591.2020.1.2
Shamsuddin, N., & Kaur, J. (2020). Students’ learning style and its effect on blended learning, does it matter? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20422
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. CV.Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (1 ed.). Penerbit Alfabeta.
Urrea, C., Delong, K., Diaz, J., Klopfer, E., Thompson, M., Wagh, A., Gardony, J., Anderson, E., & Kundargi, R. (2022). MIT Full STEAM Ahead: Bringing Project-Based, Collaborative Learning to Remote Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82159-3_20
Vallee, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., & Sorbets, E. (2020). Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. In Journal of Medical Internet Research (Vol. 22, Nomor 8). https://doi.org/10.2196/16504
Copyright (c) 2023 Eva Simanjorang, Joshua Simatupang, Windi Butarbutar, Koleta Purba, Sahlan Tampubolon, Febrika Dwi Lestari Lumbantoruan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal allows anyone to compose, correct, and do derivative works, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit for the original work. This license is the freest. It is recommended for maximum distribution and use of licensed material.
The submitted paper is assumed not to contain any proprietary materials that are not protected by patent rights or patent applications; The responsibility for technical content and protection of proprietary materials rests with the authors and their organizations and not the responsibility of journal or its editorial staff. The primary (first/appropriate) author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been viewed and approved by all other authors. The author's responsibility is to obtain all necessary copyright waivers to use any copyrighted material in the manuscript before submission.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share a copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt a remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
