SELF-EFFICACY DALAM PEMBELAJARAN: KONTRIBUSI KUIS ADAPTIF DAN APLIKASI EDUKASI BERBASIS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

  • Hadi Suryanto universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Ety Youhanita Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v12i4.2138
Keywords: self eficasi, kuis adaptif, aplikasi edukasi, artificial intelligence

Abstract

Self-efficacy merupakan faktor psikologis kunci yang memengaruhi keberhasilan belajar peserta didik. Perkembangan kecerdasan artifisial (Artificial Intelligence/AI) membuka peluang baru dalam pembelajaran melalui kuis adaptif dan aplikasi edukasi yang mampu memberikan umpan balik personal dan responsif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kontribusi penggunaan kuis adaptif dan aplikasi pembelajaran berbasis AI terhadap peningkatan self-efficacy siswa. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain quasi-eksperimental. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas 78 mahasiswa calon guru. yang dibagi ke dalam kelompok eksperimen dan kelompok kontrol. Data dikumpulkan melalui angket self-efficacy dan dianalisis menggunakan uji statistik inferensial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan kuis adaptif dan aplikasi edukasi berbasis AI berpengaruh signifikan terhadap peningkatan self-efficacy siswa dibandingkan pembelajaran konvensional. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa integrasi AI dalam pembelajaran tidak hanya meningkatkan capaian kognitif, tetapi juga memperkuat aspek afektif siswa, khususnya kepercayaan diri dalam belajar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, S., Rahmat, M., Mubarik, M., Alam, M. M., & Hyder, S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212902

Al-Hassan, M. A., Dorri, R., & Omari, E. Al. (2024). Adaptive Quizzing in nursing education: A narrative review of its potential and considerations in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. Nurse Education in Practice, 80, 104126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104126

Ali, O., Murray, P., Momin, M., Dwivedi, Y., & Malik, T. (2024). The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123076

Austin, E., Henson, A., Kim, H., Ogle, K., & Park, H. (2021). Analysis of Computer Adaptive Testing in a Pathopharmacology Course. The Journal of Nursing Education, 60 3, 155–158. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20210222-06

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

Bandura, A. (1988). Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. Anxiety Research, 1(2), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615808808248222

Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Bridgeman, A., Walker, R., Sharma, M., & Smith, L. (2016). The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 1918–1942. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.999319

Cheng, Y.-Y. (2020). Academic self-efficacy and assessment. Educational Psychology, 40, 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1755501

Choudhury, A., & Shamszare, H. (2023). Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25. https://doi.org/10.2196/47184

Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J., & Ríos, A. (2004). SIETTE: A Web-Based Tool for Adaptive Testing. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 14, 29–61. https://doi.org/10.3233/irg-2004-14(1)03

Forslund Frykedal, K., Chiriac, E. H., & Rosander, M. (2019). Efficacy beliefs and interdependence when being assessed working in a group. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1706039, 47(5), 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1706039

Gonzalez, J. T., & Gonzalez, V. M. (1990). Initial Validation of a Scale Measuring Self-Efficacy of Breast Self-Examination among Low-Income Mexican American Women. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 12(3), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863900123003

Kaspi-Baruch, O. (2018). Difference between motivational goal framing effects on creative and perceptual task performance. Creativity Studies, 11(2), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2018.3074

Kisielewska, J., Millin, P., Rice, N., Pêgo, J., Burr, S., Nowakowski, M., & Gale, T. (2023). Medical students’ perceptions of a novel international adaptive progress test. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 11323–11338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12269-4

Kundu, A. (2020). Toward a framework for strengthening participants’ self-efficacy in online education. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-06-2020-0039

Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-023-00426 -1

Prifti, R. (2020). Self–efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 37, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1755642

Ross, B., Chase, A., Robbie, D., Oates, G., & Absalom, Y. (2018). Adaptive quizzes to increase motivation, engagement and learning outcomes in a first year accounting unit. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0113-2

Salas-Pilco, S., & Yang, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: a systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w

Schunk, D. (1985). Self-Efficacy and Classroom Learning. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198504)22:2<208::aid-pits2310220215>3.0.co;2-7

Tahiru, F. (2021). AI in education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 23(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.2021010101

Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Syst. Appl., 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167

Weiss, D., & Kingsbury, G. (1984). APPLICATION OF COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING TO EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb01040.x

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhou, Y., Liu, Q., Huang, J., & Li, G. (2026). Creative scar without generative AI: Individual creativity fails to sustain while homogeneity keeps climbing. Technology in Society, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103087

Zimmerman, B. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 1, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Published
2025-12-29
How to Cite
Suryanto, H., & Youhanita, E. (2025). SELF-EFFICACY DALAM PEMBELAJARAN: KONTRIBUSI KUIS ADAPTIF DAN APLIKASI EDUKASI BERBASIS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. EDUSAINTEK: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Dan Teknologi, 12(4), 2199 -. https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v12i4.2138
Issue
Vol 12 No 4 (2025): in Press
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2025 Hadi Suryanto, Ety Youhanita

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal allows anyone to compose, correct, and do derivative works, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit for the original work. This license is the freest. It is recommended for maximum distribution and use of licensed material.

The submitted paper is assumed not to contain any proprietary materials that are not protected by patent rights or patent applications; The responsibility for technical content and protection of proprietary materials rests with the authors and their organizations and not the responsibility of journal or its editorial staff. The primary (first/appropriate) author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been viewed and approved by all other authors. The author's responsibility is to obtain all necessary copyright waivers to use any copyrighted material in the manuscript before submission.

Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA  or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.

 
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Share a copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt a remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.