- MAIN MENU
- Make a Submission
- Focus and Scope
- Reviewers
- Publication Ethics
- Publication Frequency
- Author Guidelines
- Peer Review Process
- Indexing
- Plagiarism Screening
- Article Processing Charge
- Editorial Team
- License Policy
- Digital Archiving Policy
- Contact US
- INFORMATION
- For Readers
- For Authors
- For Librarians
- Copyright Notice
- Open Access Policy
- Tools
- Article Template
- Article Template
- View My Stats
Peer-Review Process
Peer-Review Process
In the review process, Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi (Edusaintek) involves writers, editors, section editors, and reviewers. Where in the review process, this Journal applies the Double-Blind Review (reviewers do not know the identity of the authors) model to maintain confidentiality. The editor first checks every script that is submitted. Suppose the article meets the focus and scope and guidelines for writing this Journal. In that case, the manuscript is continued to the reviewer to review the novelty, objectivity, method, scientific impact, conclusion, and references of the paper, and if not suitable then the author will return teh article to the author. A minimum of two reviewers will examine each article for 6 weeks with the criteria for evaluating the manuscript, as stated in the Article Rating Form for Reviewers.